THE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Our Policy

Home

Main News

Editorials/Op-Ed

Magazines

Back Issues

News
International
National
Lahore
Islamabad
Sports
Business
Market
Corporate
ShowBiz
Fashion & Film
Comments
Editorials/Op-Ed
Today's Cartoon

The Company
Advertise
Contact Us
Quick Vote
Do you think suicide bomber belongs to Taliban?




View Poll Results
Magazines
Actions
Your Comments
---Sunday Magazine---




BOOK REVIEW

:: The Great Divide India and Pakistan ::

Edited by Ira Pande
Reviewed by Saeed Naqvi

The independence of India was also its partition into India and Pakistan. The plot thickened when the world itself was divided into two blocs. The Cold War consolidated the division of the subcontinent, with Pakistan seeking security in the US-led western bloc. India was more subtle: non-aligned but more inclined towards the Soviet Union.

Partition had begun to take shape ever since Hindus and Muslims jointly fought the first war of independence in 1857.

Altruism had not guided British interests in India, and after 1857, it would have been less than clever of them not to pursue a policy of divide and rule.

Nothing embodied the evolution of India's composite culture more than Wajid Ali Shah, the remarkable king of Avadh, patron of music, dance, poetry, plays; choreographer of Hindu and Muslim religious observance. This incredible Hindu-Muslim cultural commerce must have been discomfiting for the British. After the annexation of Avadh in 1856, the unusually popular king could have been kept in confinement. But the British realised that such a powerful symbol of Indian unity had to be banished, far from Lucknow and Faizabad, to Metiabruz, near the headquarters of the East India Company in Calcutta.

During the British period, Muslims, wrapped in a nostalgia of links, however remote, to the Muslim ruling class, insulated themselves in a cultural cocoon.

The Brahmin elite, meanwhile, found it convenient to keep an equal distance from both the earlier rulers as well as the new ones.

For millennia, accustomed to placing a premium on the life of the mind, this elite took to English education as one more avenue of 'gyaan'. They knew it was the ultimate power.

The education-divide between Hindus and Muslims remains the bane of the Muslim minority. It also sets a backdrop for Pakistan's emergence as a non-egalitarian, feudal, less-developed society.

It was the extended commerce between a young, vigorous culture and one of the world's oldest civilisations that led to the blossoming of India's composite culture. A way of life bereft of rigidities, reaching out to all humanity, wearing the aesthetics of Sufism and Bhakti, one that coloured the minds of Guru Nanak, Kabir, Rahim, Nazir Akbarabadi.

Once Pakistan came into being (reinforced by the Cold War), conflict was built into the relationship. The US-Pak military pact of the '50s helped build an army worthy of a Cold War "Kurukshetra" and also to secure an Islamic Pakistan from a much bigger India, which, in Pakistan's perception, had complicated matters by adopting a secular creed.

A Hindu India and a Muslim Pakistan would have confirmed two simplified entities in total confirmation of the 'Two-Nation theory', that is, Hindus and Muslims constitute two nations.

---PDF Corner---
::Today's Front Page
::Today's Back Page
---R E V I E W S---
ShowBiz

Preity plays role of dedicated daughter

Sports

‘Yousuf, Younus ban may destroy Pak cricket’

©Copy Rights Reserved

web@thepost.com.pk